Judicial activism supports which approach?

Judicial activism supports which approach?

• A. Life tenure
• B. Public opinion
• C. Strict textualism
• D. Flexible interpretation based on modern values

Answer: (D)

Judicial activism rests on treating the Constitution as a living document whose meaning can evolve with society. This view encourages interpreting laws and constitutional rights in light of current values and social needs, allowing the judiciary to address issues that might not be settled by the text alone. The description that best matches this approach is a flexible interpretation based on modern values, because it emphasizes adapting legal meaning to contemporary circumstances rather than sticking strictly to the original wording or intent. The other ideas don’t fit as well. The concept of life tenure concerns the stability and independence of judges, not how they interpret the law. Public opinion can influence politics and culture, but it isn’t the formal method judges use to interpret constitutional provisions. Strict textualism sticks to the exact text and original meaning, resisting modern reinterpretation, which is the opposite of judicial activism.

Judicial activism rests on treating the Constitution as a living document whose meaning can evolve with society. This view encourages interpreting laws and constitutional rights in light of current values and social needs, allowing the judiciary to address issues that might not be settled by the text alone. The description that best matches this approach is a flexible interpretation based on modern values, because it emphasizes adapting legal meaning to contemporary circumstances rather than sticking strictly to the original wording or intent.

The other ideas don’t fit as well. The concept of life tenure concerns the stability and independence of judges, not how they interpret the law. Public opinion can influence politics and culture, but it isn’t the formal method judges use to interpret constitutional provisions. Strict textualism sticks to the exact text and original meaning, resisting modern reinterpretation, which is the opposite of judicial activism.